Consolidating several Syspro (V6) companies into one Syspro (V7) company.

I was tasked to project manage the consolidation of 13 x Syspro (V6) companies into one Syspro (V7) company in 2015.

The first phase was a master file cleanup, standardisation and setup check.  The following areas were covered:

Inventory Master  (InvMaster)

I had to ensure each (unique) StockCode had the same description, Unit of Measure, Alternate Unit Of Measure and conversion factor, etc. – and that it represented the same item in reality – for all companies.  I found the easiest way to do this, was to create a single ‘consolidated’ InvMaster – and compare each companies’ data to it.

Customer and Supplier Master (ArCustomer and ApSupplier)

Each companies’ Customer and Supplier accounts remained unique – but Area, Class, Branch, Terms Codes, etc. had to be standardised across all companies.  Price lists and Contracts were also made unique.

General Ledger (GenMaster)

There was no time for a complete re-code of all GlCodes – so I prefixed each companies’ GlCodes to make it unique.

Other data and setup

Banks, Tax Codes, Gl Integration, Document Numbering, additional fields*, were just some of the list of areas that were covered.

*V6 uses AdmFormData, whereas V7 makes use of the (MUCH more convenient) ‘plus’ tables.  e.g. [InvMaster+], [ArCustomer+], etc.


A staggered approach was used for implementation (as opposed to a ‘big bang’) – and this proved to be very wise.  Learnings from each go-live were incorporated for the next consolidation run.

I wrote SQL Server 2014 scripts to handle the extraction, transformation and loading (ETL) of each companies’ Syspro data into the Consolidated environment.  For the very first implementation, I ran the (list of 70!) manually – but the rest was done via SQL Server Jobs.

How to age stock value (Aged Inventory Valuation) in Syspro with Costing method = Average

I recently wrote a report for a customer with Average costing switched ON, so there were no dated lots/batches to use in the aging.

I made the assumption that FIFO was used.

I first calculated the receipts (POs, Jobs, Adjustments and Stock Receipts) quantities and values for the last 3, 6, 9, 12 (etc.) months, at Actual Costs (from InvMovements).
I then systematically calculated backward from the InvWarehouse.QtyOnHand, by deducting each period’s receipts, until InvWarehouse.QtyOnHand was ‘depleted’. The remaining periods’ receipts were then cleared/zeroed.

Let me know if you need assistance with something similar.

Syspro Stock Take System – find Sales Orders that will result in a negative ShipQty

When a stock take result will cause a Sales Order’s Ship Qty to go to negative or zero – the Stock Take Confirmation process will halt – until all the relevant Sales Order detail lines are de-allocated (‘available’).  Syspro’s standard report shows a list of StockCodes – so one would need to find the relating Sales Order(s) (via Inventory Enquiry) – and de-allocate accordingly.  Quite a lengthy process!

But here’s a SQL query that will produce a (crude) list of Sales Order numbers that are preventing the Stock Take Confirmation to complete:

 FROM SorDetail d, SorMaster h
 WHERE h.CancelledFlag <> 'Y'
 AND h.OrderStatus <> '9'
 AND h.OrderStatus <> '*'
 AND h.OrderStatus <> '\'
 AND d.SalesOrderDetStat <> 'C'
 AND d.SalesOrder = h.SalesOrder
 AND h.DocumentType <> 'C'
 AND d.LineType <> '6'
 AND (d.MShipQty + d.MBackOrderQty) > 0
 AND CONCAT(d.MWarehouse, d.MStockCode) IN (
 SELECT CONCAT(w.Warehouse, w.StockCode)
 FROM InvWarehouse w, InvStockTake s
 WHERE w.Warehouse = s.Warehouse
 AND w.StockCode = s.StockCode 
 AND (s.OrigQtyOnHand - s.QtyCaptured) > 0 -- Only interested in REDUCTIONS
 AND ((w.QtyOnHand-(w.QtyAllocated-w.QtyOnBackOrder)) - (s.OrigQtyOnHand - s.QtyCaptured)) < 0 -- Only where ShipQtys will be affected
 ORDER BY h.SalesOrder

This might speed this up!

PS:  It might even speed things up more – if you run this BEFORE the stock take – and reduce allocations where more than 90% of the stock holding is allocated to Sales Orders.



How Syspro’s GenJournalDetail Comment is made up 1 : AP Invoice posting

Sure one can identify an AP Invoice posting in GenJournalDetail by looking for Source = ‘AP’ and Type = ‘EXP’ – but how is the ‘Comment’ compiled – or how do you search for ‘your’ AP Invoice?

I think the image below is self explanatory.  I’d search for WHERE GenJournalDetail.Comment LIKE ‘Jnl:%Inv:%<your Inv No or part of>%’;


How to make a string out of a list (or a set of rows) MS SQL

You’ve got table #t1:

InvoiceNumber StockCode
Inv001 Stk001
Inv001 Stk002
Inv001 Stk003
Inv002 Stk001
Inv002 Stk003

But you want:

InvoiceNumber StockList
Inv001 Stk001,Stk002,Stk003
Inv002 Stk001,Stk003


Then use:


DISTINCT t2.InvoiceNumber,


FROM #t1 t1

WHERE t1.InvoiceNumber = t2.InvoiceNumber

ORDER BY t1.InvoiceNumber,StockCode

For XML PATH ()),2, 1000)[StockList]

FROM  #t1 t2;


How to get the most out of your ERP training

1.  I’ve said it before – keep your staff training as close as possible to go-live.  People forget.  Quickly.

2.  Have the training facility load your data!   If the training is done off-site, people will be overwhelmed by the new environment – they’ll be even more lost if they do not see ‘their’ Stock Code, Suppliers, Customers, etc.

3.  Have the training facility print and copy a few screenshots.  Picture = 1000 words.  Trainees can then make notes on these and take them back to the office.  Save the cost of having a (traditional) training manual printed – nobody looks at them.. ever.

4.  Ensure that the trainer show you how to reverse an entry.  (Or fix a punching error).  This causes 90% of go-live chaos:  users do not know how to fix their own mistakes.

5.  It is not often that a company gets the chance to investigate their business processes as thuroughly as what usually happens during a ERP implementation and training sessions.  Make use of this opportunity to improve and streamline your business!